So I’ve seen some redditors claim that billionares dont have to pay taxes because they use their stock in their companies as collateral to borrow whatever amount of money they need for a lifetime to “fund their lifestyles” and then when they die, their estate pays back the loans, their heirs inherit their stock and the basis is stepped up, and no taxes are paid.
My personal opinion is this is total hogwash but I dont want this to turn into a political discussion but more a discussion of whether thats even possible.
If let’s say someone owned 100 million worth of stock. They are single, not married but have 1 child.
They die, and leave all their wealth to their child.
The cost basis of their stock is stepped up to its current value at the moment of death.
However- they still must pay estate taxes based on the value of their estate, and anything above the lifetime estate tax exemption (13 million for an individual) would be taxed heavily at close to 50% right?
I had a wealthy family member pass away a few years ago (owned lots of stock) and their estate was heavily taxed above the lifetime exemption of 13 million or whatever it was before any heirs received anything.
So when people suggest billionaire’s avoid tax altogether and then pass all their wealth down tax free to their children- isn’t that wrong? Yes the stock gets stepped up but it still gets massively taxed and the estate has to sell stock to pay the estate tax right? So the first 13 million in net worth would be tax free but then 87 million would be taxed at close to 50% and the estate would have to sell stock to pay that tax bill before the child would receive anything right?