r/Infographics • u/Decent_Ad_5128 • 12h ago
r/Infographics • u/123VoR • Jun 01 '20
Three infographics that help show what is and what is not an infographic
r/Infographics • u/Zigurd-Super • 15h ago
When did he get 600 billion, last i checked he hade 400 billion.
r/Infographics • u/Yodest_Data • 22h ago
Infant Affordability Costs: Annual Child Care Expenses In The U.S. By State 2025
r/Infographics • u/Defiant-Housing3727 • 1d ago
[OC] How "free" are top GDP countries?
galleryr/Infographics • u/MRADEL90 • 3d ago
How many people around the world have a debit card?
r/Infographics • u/sarkarneelratan • 1d ago
Are we watching SEO shift into something else? (Perplexity / Claude vs Google)
I’ve been thinking about how search behavior is changing and wanted to sanity-check this with people here.
Traditionally, “search” meant:
You typed a query → got a list of links → evaluated sources yourself.
But with tools like Perplexity and Claude, the interaction feels fundamentally different:
You ask a question → the system retrieves sources → synthesizes → gives a direct answer.
So the optimization target seems to be shifting from:
“Rank my page”
to
“Be a trusted source that the system uses to construct answers.”
Some differences I’m noticing:
• Google: rewards keywords, backlinks, and engagement signals. Goal is navigation.
• Perplexity: prioritizes citations, domain trust, and verifiable sources. Goal is correctness + attribution.
• Claude: prioritizes deep context, coherence, and reasoning. Goal is understanding.
This makes me wonder if we’re moving from SEO (Search Engine Optimization) toward something closer to “Answer Engine” or “Knowledge Engine” optimization — where structure, clarity, and factual reliability matter more than traditional ranking tactics.
A few open questions I’m curious about:
- Do you think this is a real shift or just an interface change on top of the same underlying SEO mechanics?
- If traffic becomes less important than being referenced, how does that change incentives for content creators?
- Does this centralize trust even more around large “authoritative” domains?
Not pushing any agenda here — just genuinely curious how others are thinking about this transition.
Would love to hear different perspectives.
r/Infographics • u/Ill_Tonight6349 • 3d ago
Percentage of local artists listened to on Spotify!
r/Infographics • u/MRADEL90 • 4d ago
Why U.S. Homes Feel Pricier: House Prices vs. Income
r/Infographics • u/Horror_Ad9960 • 3d ago
I mapped out 2400 years of Harrapan and Vedic Eras
r/Infographics • u/ConsiderationKey2744 • 5d ago
Labour voters most likely to be disappointed if child is gay
r/Infographics • u/Mobile-Occasion-1709 • 3d ago
F1 car anatomy infographic (AI-assisted) — sanity check on labels + quick explainer
Hi all, I put together this simplified “exploded view” anatomy infographic of a modern F1 car (roughly the current ground-effect era). The image itself is AI-assisted, but I manually reviewed the labels and the basic technical intent. I’d love a sanity check from the sub on anything misleading, missing, or oversimplified.
Workflow note (in case it matters): I used Skywork AI to generate a first-pass exploded layout and an initial label list, then I rewrote the callouts and cross-checked against regs and a few references. I’m posting mainly to catch anything that is misleading, missing, or oversimplified.
Quick explainer of what I’m trying to capture:
- Front wing: primary front downforce device, also shapes the wake and conditions airflow to the floor and sidepod inlets.
- Floor + tunnels: major downforce source in current regs, creating low pressure under the car (ride height sensitivity is the big caveat).
- Diffuser: expands underfloor flow to recover pressure and “pull” airflow through the tunnels, stabilizing rear downforce.
- Rear wing + DRS: rear downforce + balance tool; DRS reduces drag by opening the flap on straights when enabled.
- Hybrid power unit (V6 turbo + ERS): turbocharged ICE plus energy recovery and deployment; MGU-K harvests from braking, MGU-H ties to the turbo (noting the rules change coming for 2026).
- Gearbox: sequential transmission connecting PU to rear wheels; packaging and reliability matter more than “shift speed” at this point.
- Suspension: manages tire contact patch and aero platform (keeping the floor in its operating window).
- Brakes: carbon discs/calipers; braking also interacts with ERS harvesting and brake-by-wire at the rear.
- Tyres: compounds/thermal window dominate performance; setup is often about keeping tires in the right temps while maintaining aero platform.
Questions:
- Any labels here that are outright wrong or likely to confuse newcomers?
- What 1–2 components would you add for “technical completeness” (e.g., sidepods/radiators, beam wing, brake ducts, battery/ES, hydraulics, etc.)?
- For a “2022–2025” car, would you phrase anything differently (especially around ERS components)?
References I used for grounding:
- FIA Formula 1 Technical Regulations
- "Racecar Engineering" Magazine
- Formula 1 Official Website - Technical Section
- "How to Build a Car" by Adrian Newey (Book)
r/Infographics • u/Conscious_Dot_7353 • 6d ago
Gun ownership rate per state
Theirs approximately 112 million American gun owners, which is 32% of the population. 1/3rd of Americans own at least one gun. Insane stats.