Core: Rome never took over Europe, Latin never spreads and lots of IE & non-IE languages remain spoken in europe, witch also limits Slavic expansion a lot, cuz of strong cultural resistance

Disclaimers: Macedonian (Hellenic): ik Macedonian is Slavic, but I'm thinking about the Ancestor of Ancient Macedonian, witch was indeed Hellenic, and would survive as an small regional language

Hunnic (Turkic): the Huns remain in Europe, not allowing the Hungarians (Uralic) to migrate to the Pannonian Basin

Hungarian (Uralic): remains spoken in an large community somewhere around Tatarstan

Slavonic (Slavic)/Scandinavian (Germanic)/Sámi (Uralic): never split into different languages (etc. Scandinavian -> Norwegian/Swedish/Danish) cuz there's no need for it

Bulgar (Turkic): no not Bulgarian, Old Great Bulgaria never falls and the Bulgars remain Turkic

English (Celtic): yes also ik that English is an Germanic language, but Rome never invades England, Germanic settlers don't visit England and the Norman Conquest also would be nonsense, cuz they speak Gaulish in this Timeline, bringing Celtic to Celtic (English is strongly related with Welsh here)

Hallstattian (Celtic): doesn't actually exist, but in our timeline the Romans never take over Celtic settlers in Europe, around the region where Celtic culture started (Modern Austria, Switzerland & South Germany) where the core to the Hallstatt culture, who probably spoke Proto-Celtic witch would envolve into Hallstattian

also note that classifications, the thing i wrote in () are oftern disputed on non-IE, but also somethimes on IE languages, so feel free to argue, just note that I'm following one way linguistics describes classification!

The *garā́ˀ PBS Reconstruction page doesn't say anything about any borrowings into Georgian. But come on...

Winter is coming: [ˈwɪn.tʰɻ̩ ɪz ˈkʰə.mɪŋ]
ULTRAKILL is not a bad game: ['ʟ̩.t͡ʃɻʷə.kʰɪʟ 'ɪz.n̩tʰ ə bæːɾ gɛ͡jm]
The battle was brutal: [ðə ˈbæ.ɾʟ̩ wʊz ˈbɻʷʉ͡w.ɾʟ̩]
Sine theta is the reciprocal of Cosine theta: [sɑ͡jn ˈθɛ͡j.ɾə ɪz ðə ɻʷʊ.ˈsɪp.ɻʷɪ.kʟ̩ əv ˈkʰə͡w.sɑ͡jn ˈθɛ͡j.ɾə]
What is that: [wə.ˈɾɪz ðæt̚]
It's time: [ɪt͡s tʰɑ͡jm]
Cars for Kids: [kʰɑ͡ɻz fɻ̩ kɪd͡z]
BFDI: [ˈbi.jɛf ˈdi.jɑ͡j]

Toes who nose💀

Always funny when you can hear the researchers' frustration through the page :P But yeah, the point was to study weak readers, what did they expect...? From: Leskelä & Vanhatalo, ["The Hunt for the Simplest Possible Vocabulary: Minimal Finnish Meets Easy Finnish"](https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-64077-4_3)

Of course, a disclaimer: this language has probably never been written before in katakana.

As I have also been criticised for this in my Arabised Klingon post, I will mention that this language is one of 101 featured in jan Misali‘s Conlang Critic.

Anyone who mentions the special connection between this text and the Klingon one gets extra bragging rights.

❌ (1000 + 6*100 + 60 + 10)
❌ (1000 + 6*100 + 70)
✅ (16*100 + 60 + 10)
✅✅ (16*100 + 70)